AK research and newsroom prototype
BNVI — Breaking News Verification Index

Open, research-grade newsroom tool

A practical index for testing how well a newsroom has verified a breaking-news claim before amplifying it.

BNVI is designed for real newsroom conditions: frightened eyewitnesses, incomplete access, contradictory official statements, social visuals of uncertain origin, and the pressure to publish before full certainty exists. It treats verification as a visible process that can be scored, explained, and updated.

Open the instrument

About BNVI

BNVI is an epistemic reporting instrument. It does not decide truth; it structures how a newsroom records, tests, narrows, and discloses claims during breaking news.

  • Purpose: convert vague verification norms into observable reporting actions across eyewitnesses, visuals, official claims, and live updates.
  • Unit of analysis: the reporting process around a specific breaking-news claim, not the moral character of a source.
  • Use case: phone-ins, eyewitness media, social visuals, official denials, and fast-moving web updates.

BNVI methodology

The BNVI scoring model is a structured prompt. It operationalizes verification through source path, provenance, time-place fit, contradiction testing, and audience transparency.

  • What the score means: readiness to publish a claim responsibly under current evidence constraints.
  • What the score does not mean: certainty, innocence, guilt, or final truth.
  • Interpretive rule: low scores require narrowing or holding; mid scores require caveats and a verification log; high scores still require revision room.

BNVI modules

Tick only the work you have actually done. BNVI scores the reporting pathway, not your confidence.

1. EVI subscale: source identity

Establish whether the source plausibly is who they say they are and whether their position in the event is credible.

2. EVI subscale: eyewitness evidence

Do not stop at the spoken account. Ask what the source can show, send, or substantiate.

3. Social-media visuals

Visuals need their own verification track. A compelling image can still be old, miscaptioned, synthetic, or geographically wrong.

4. Triangulation

Cross-check the account against other human and documentary sources, not just your own intuition.

5. Official-source conflict

This subscale is for situations where officials deny, minimize, delay, or strategically blur what appears to be happening.

6. Newsroom constraints

If corroboration is incomplete, the explanation of constraint is part of the reporting, not a private excuse.

7. Audience transparency

The viewer or reader should see the state of knowledge, not just the newsroom’s final posture.

Verification spectrum

The score is a discipline aid, not a substitute for editorial judgment.

0–34

Hold. Too much rests on untested witness language, weak visuals, or unresolved official conflict.

35–59

Publish only as a narrow, caveated account. No sweeping framing.

60–79

Publish with a visible verification note and update plan.

80–100

Publish as strongly corroborated reporting while keeping room for correction and revision.

Transparency note

Draft language for broadcast, web, or live-blog publication.

Public verification log

Web-ready process disclosure modeled on the idea of showing the reporting trail, roadblocks, and dead ends.

  • Use timestamps for each update and distinguish updates from corrections.
  • Separate what is observed, what is alleged, what is denied, and what is unresolved.
  • State dead ends plainly: no answer, unsafe access, unavailable records, no budget, or no usable original files.

AK intro and use note

BNVI is an open, research-grade interactive index created to help journalists, editors, students, and researchers evaluate the evidentiary strength and publication readiness of breaking-news reporting. It is designed for practical use in newsrooms, classrooms, and independent reporting environments where transparency about methods, limits, and unresolved uncertainty is part of the journalism itself.

  • Use BNVI before publication, during live updates, or in post-publication review.
  • Use the score as a structured discipline aid, not as a substitute for editorial judgment.
  • Use the transparency note and verification log to show your audience what you know, what you do not know, and what you are still trying to verify.