That people still believe that Twitter rage is some homegrown and organic response is interesting.
But when the press still falls for it and doesn’t try to expose the political propaganda that runs there amok, you really have to wonder.
There is an article from the New York Post how Twitter attacks “protect” people.
No, it merely exposes the paid political skulduggery going on unchallenged.
Why aren’t you questioning who is attacking or what is their real incentive?
We already know how much fraudulent activity and fake accounts there are on Twitter. There is no way to stop it unless people stopped using Twitter and then there would be no benefit to wasting resources of dispatching mass propagandists.
Don’t bother with trying to take on a paid mob.
Find out who is footing the bill, and cut off that source.
Dangle a piece of meat, get the paid hordes to react on cue, and then work from behind the curtain and expose that.
So why are we still not critically looking at fake outrage on Twitter?
What? You don’t think politicians build up a fake base or deflect criticism using Twitter?
Don’t buy into the fairytale. As there are absolutely no checks and balances, anyone can create any fake mass response they want.
There are no laws or regulations. You don’t know what is on the other side. Underlings, cyber goons, political operatives, bots, the politician’s mommy or daddy, anyone.
That is the way you incite emptyheads and fool the press into thinking something is genuine.
It is why I don’t stare at Twitter: other people ghost write the tweets with blue checkmarks and foot the bill for fake responses.
Let’s as a few real questions before we buy into some fake narrative…