Silly, silly questions.
The Globe and Mail has a column that seriously asks this question as a headline:
What happened to our ‘feminist’ Prime Minister?
SIllies, we never had one.
This is what privileged boys say to the gullible girlies to get what they want.
They will whisper all sorts of a sweet nothings in your ear, and then, once they get the goodies, behave the way they really do as they openly disrespect you and blame you for being naive. The second a certain cabinet minister stepped out of his line, she was kicked to the curb and brandished as being “difficult.”
But if you were real feminists yourselves, you would have seen the glaring warning signs a hundred miles away.
Even in the article, the blaring warning sign was there, and the columnist still doesn’t see the significance of the statement I underlined:
In September 2017 I was in the audience at the Women in the World Summit in Toronto, and listened to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau talk about his feminist bona fides. Well, first we had to watch a video – many clips set to a pumping rock score – on that subject.
…Then he made a very interesting point about how it was relatively easy to recruit women into politics, compared with keeping them there, which he called “a challenge around retention.” Women would be elected, he said, and after a couple of years wonder if this business was really for them, “because of the nastiness, because of the negativity.”
What? Are the womenfolk so weak and feeble they can’t take the heat and we need a man person to make it all nice and comfy for us? We needed Justy to give us all pats on the head and lollipops and balloons?
And you didn’t call him out right then and there? That’s as misogynistic as it gets.
Y’all are so hopelessly oblivious and naive, it’s too funny…