This is an ignorant tweet.
No, it’s not where the US is "at.”
It is in the 1990s when Democratic President Bill Clinton was accused of having truckloads of people whacked on his climb to the White House as if he were Tony Soprano only with a saxophone and a Southern accent, according to Republicans with their various vast and diabolical conspiracy theories and the Democrats correctly thought that the GOP were hysterical loons who were just reaching.
We just flipped the roles now where it is the Democrats who are the conspiracy-spewing hysterical loons saying the same childish thing about Trump that the Republicans said about the Clintons.
It is just sour grapes.
The middle class live in the now. The wealthy live in the future. The poor are stuck in the past.
And as journalism always pandered to the middle class, they stuck themselves in the now.
But never actually saw that obvious truth.
Prey live in the now. Predators think steps ahead. Prey and predators who were taken down are stuck in the past.
But when a predatory profession such as journalism emulates prey like the proverbial wolf in sheep’s clothing, and begins to assimilate to whom they are pandering, they lose their advantage and get hunted down.
And in this case, the wilier predator was Big Tech.
They bamboozled credulous journalists who live in the now that the future was strictly “video.” They took this decree to be Divine Truth and changed what they did to be hip, with bad results, and Nieman Labs honestly asking stupid questions:
Did Facebook’s faulty data push news publishers to make terrible decisions on video?
Publishers’ “pivot to video” was driven largely by a belief that if Facebook was seeing users, in massive numbers, shift to video from text, the trend must be real.
And then recalling the fateful moment when the profession got played:
“It will probably be all video.”
In June 2016, Nicola Mendelsohn, Facebook’s VP for Europe, the Middle East and Africa, spent several minutes of a panel at a Fortune conferencetalking about how Facebook was witnessing video overtake text.
“We’re seeing a year-on-year decline on text,” Mendelsohn answered. “We’re seeing a massive increase, as I’ve said, on both pictures and video. So I think, yeah, if I was having a bet, I would say: Video, video, video.”
“Wow,” the moderator, Pattie Sellers, responded.
“The best way to tell stories, in this world where so much information is coming at us, actually is video,” Mendelsohn continued. “It commands so much more information in a much quicker period. So actually, the trend helps us to digest more of the information, in a quicker way.”
I called it out as bullshit then, and in other places as well.
But journalists didn’t call it out as anything but the gospel, and dutifully followed someone else’s decrees, even though Facebook is hardly an honest corporation.
And still, the Associated Press gives them yet another journalistic free pass with this piece of PR baloney:
Facebook’s election ‘war room’ takes aim at fake information
As if they were qualified or credible. They throw money and algorithms at the problem, never considering their shoddy methods will do nothing but provide some ineffectual window-dressing to make their PR problems go away and have proven to be as credible as the now defunct journalism profession.
My favourite part of this photo op is the picture with the photocopy sign of “War room” taped on the wall. Gee, that makes it real if you post the sign on the door.
And you buy what they are selling yet again? Are you teachable?
When you live in the now, you have no purpose or meaning in your individual or collective existence.
Here is another ignorant meme, this time on Facebook:
Yes, there are plenty of gay animals. One of my cats, Davy Jones, is one of them. He has never had any attraction to female cats, but the male who doesn’t reciprocate. They are all fixed, but it doesn’t change the fact that many animals in nature are gay, or that Davy Jones is the kindest, most responsible, loving, and well-behaved cat I’ve ever known.
But the second part that animals do not practice religion is bullshit.
It is a real phenomena, and one I studied as a psych student. We do not know what goes on in the hearts and minds of animals; so do not speak on their behalf.
But this meme is classic middle class logic: there is just black and white and we assume that we have to have 100% occurrences for it to be real and definitive. This is primitive and patriarchal binary rote thinking or The One Rule That Explains Everything.
No intelligent person would say no animals have religion. That would be to ignore a wealth of data that says otherwise.
An intelligent person would say, it is more than possible, but probable, and look for confirming and refuting proof.
But in order to do that, you cannot just live in the now.
You have to be living in the past, present, and future simultaneously.
In other words, you have to be in tune with reality.
So no, religion is not only not “against nature”, it is a biological drive.
It is innate and natural.
Even atheists treat their atheism as a religion without a god with their incessant need to preach and hold on to their unscientific beliefs as they create pecking orders and using othering to separate themselves from those who do believe.
They have not found the loophole that places them higher on any real intellectual pecking order. They are just disguising their primitive thinking.
Because religion occurs in every single nation and civilization. Neanderthals practiced it. Animals practice it.
So what we have is a lie and a piece of propaganda spewed by atheists who want to rig public opinion to force everyone to think just like them, and they will lie and ignore facts to do it.
Just like a religious fanatic. No difference in structure or motive to control others, but just choosing different content of thought.
So atheists spew untested and unscientific garbage just like those who use the bible to try to control people.
People hedge their bets going for whatever seems posh or safe to believe and follow it with no regards to past history or the consequences of their actions.
They way people who live in the now operate.
The way so-called “middle class avengers” are throwing temper tantrums in public, beating up on people who have different beliefs than they do — but try to spin a narrative that their violence and aggression is moral.
No, it isn’t. You’re just an air-headed thug who is morally masturbating in public using misdirection to hide your own wickedness, except you are doing wicked things.
Just like those who burned women at the stake at Salem and said they were doing a public service.
But when you live in the now, whatever garbage someone else pops in your empty head seems great and glorious.
These are not anarchists: these are spoiled and sheltered followers who were trained by social media to throw tantrums and do nothing but complain when things do not conform 100% to their sheltered and unscientific beliefs.
People are using ideology to use virtue-signalling as a Trojan Horse in order to gain control of other people.
But when you want 100% compliance, not only do others spit in your face and do whatever they want to do, but reality and truth do the same thing.
The middle class can never grasp it because the past and future are foreign concepts to them. Whatever they see on television or online is what they are thinking.
Well, you caught me doing my favorite thing -- reading a good book! You know, I like to think of my mind as a big, empty bucket, just waiting to be filled with pictures and words and...whatever. Surprise me! That's why Vogue is my favorite book...and you know, I have my own library -- volumes and volumes of Vogue. You know, I can just refer to them. What was I thinking last October? Well, I can look, and it's right her, between September and November!
Except there is no library of previous thoughts.
But not only does the middle class not think about tomorrow, let alone yesterday, journalists are the same, as this ridiculous and arrogant Think Progress drivel spews:
As ‘news deserts’ widen across America, communities and civic engagement fray
A new study has researchers worried about the future of our democracy.
Not at all, and a bad study with no context proves nothing.
The myth of a “news desert” is just that — a myth. It is no different than the myth that animals cannot be gay, that animals cannot be religious, that religion is unnatural, or that the president you did not vote for is a real-life Vito Corleone.
Get a grip, children.
Social media has replaced journalism for now. It is the place holder, and what is happening is the same thing that happened during the Pre-Penny Press Era, when everything was partisan and there were many newspapers shilling and manipulating people trying to gain dominance, destroy the competition, and gain patronage appointments from those in power.
This article is just another way of trying to scare people into going back into their cages where it is journalists alone who tell them what to think and how to think it.
The 1980s had more honesty, not just from Nora Dunn, but from Diane Sawyer whose Letterman film short from 1986 is also worth repeating.
That was always journalism’s default goal: to do or say whatever they want, and the crowd they called their own all happily marched behind them, cheering them on.
Now that they lost their grip of tomorrow as they forgot their past, other like-minded people are trying to cut in on their bit.
That is why future generations will call this era the Dark Ages where sophistry and temper tantrums were coming from everyone, including those with doctorates.
Because they all chose willingly — and willfully — to live in the now.
That is the reason the middle class are jittery by nature: because they are not visionaries. They follow whatever an Establishment tells them to do, even when they try to “do their own thing.”
Because the majority of people in the Western world identify as middle class, they are the ones trying to break out to be the next intellectual dictator and messiah, giving the impression that things are unravelling, when the opposite is happening.
If they are all behaving alike, there may be content incongruity, but not structural incongruity.
Meaning they are all walking lockstep.
And sooner or later, that lockstepping will trip up their plans.
Big Tech will not be able to do anything about it. Journalism won’t, either.
But when you have an alternative to journalism that can do something none of the other structures can do, that’s when things begin to change.
And that something else is not to merely live in the now with no respect for yesterday or tomorrow…